Get quick answers to the most common questions about EdTechXperts' services
We offer tailored consulting across six key areas:
We work primarily with higher education leaders—including provosts, CIOs, deans, and assessment managers. We span public, private, and professional schools.
We also work with EdTech companies and their leadership to build better products and elevate the tools available for todays educational landscape.
Absolutely. We help you map data to accreditor standards, build internal accountability systems, prepare your team for site visits, and develop repeatable processes. We’ve worked with HLC, SACSCOC, WSCUC, ACEN, CAPTE, and more
We offer proctoring and integrity support, including:
We guide institutions through:
We align learning outcomes with both course and program-level measures, close performance gaps, convert reports into real-time insights, and train faculty and assessment teams.
We assist in identifying key credentials, integration with tools like Accredible or Badgr, designing stackable pathways, and communicating value to employers and learners.
Yes, through our strategic partnerships, we offer access to offshore engineering teams that specialize in:
This allows institutions to scale their development and support capabilities cost-effectively.
EdTech consultants help programs prepare for accreditation by organizing evidence, aligning assessments with standards, and streamlining reporting. At EdTechXperts, we specialize in accreditor-specific frameworks like ACPE, CAPTE, and HLC—reducing prep time and improving outcomes.
Institutional assessment measures outcomes across the entire university, while programmatic assessment focuses on specific academic programs (e.g., Nursing, PT). Both are critical for accreditation and improvement, and our SaaS tools support both levels with dashboards, KPIs, and evidence tracking.
Most faculty and staff see assessment as a compliance task, not a continuous improvement process. Without the right tools or leadership support, adoption stalls. We help institutions shift this culture by simplifying workflows and aligning goals with faculty priorities.
A KPI dashboard tracks key performance indicators like student learning outcomes, retention rates, and accreditation progress. Dashability, our weekly KPI tracker, is built for deans and directors who want clear visibility across departments.
By automating evidence collection, tagging, and reporting, SaaS tools eliminate hours of manual work. Faculty can focus on improving learning, not compiling spreadsheets. EdTechXperts helps institutions adopt platforms that reduce friction and increase data confidence.
At a minimum, once per semester. But high-performing programs review KPIs monthly, or even weekly. Our tools support short-cycle reviews that lead to timely interventions and better student outcomes.
Common issues include poor documentation, unclear alignment with criteria, and disorganized evidence. We help institutions avoid these by building structured evidence libraries and guiding teams through mock reviews using HLC's own framework.
Yes. AI can assist in mapping curriculum to outcomes, detecting gaps, and even suggesting improvements. Our upcoming tools integrate AI to speed up evidence analysis and narrative development, without replacing human judgment.
ROI includes time saved, improved accreditation outcomes, better student performance tracking, and reduced burnout. Clients have cut reporting time by up to 50% and increased stakeholder engagement with real-time data.
Deans should prioritize tools that offer real-time data, customizable KPI dashboards, and alignment with accreditation standards. Look for ease of use, support for faculty collaboration, and the ability to generate reports without technical assistance. The best tools simplify, not complicate, the assessment process.
Leaders can track trends in course performance, identify at-risk students earlier, and align learning outcomes with instructional methods. By using visual dashboards and real-time alerts, they can take action before issues escalate.
Without visibility across departments, assessment efforts become siloed and inefficient. Cross-department dashboards allow leadership to see patterns, share best practices, and align institutional goals with program-level improvements.
Show how the tool reduces their workload, not adds to it. Provide training, recognize early adopters, and involve faculty in the selection process. Transparency and quick wins go a long way toward building lasting buy-in.
We audit your current platforms (like LMS, assessment tools, and curriculum software) and identify underused features. Then, we help optimize workflows, train staff, and connect systems—often increasing ROI without new purchases.
It’s the ongoing process of collecting, reviewing, and acting on data to enhance student learning and program effectiveness. Unlike one-time evaluations, continuous improvement involves short, regular review cycles—something our tools and frameworks are built to support.
By surfacing key metrics like graduation rates, licensure pass rates, or curriculum gaps, SaaS tools help leaders make data-informed decisions. Dashboards aligned with strategic goals ensure that planning isn’t based on outdated or incomplete data.
If you’re using spreadsheets for outcomes tracking, manually preparing accreditation reports, or lacking clear KPIs, your office is overdue. Modernization improves efficiency, reduces errors, and increases institutional agility.
If it’s too complex, people won’t use it, especially faculty. The best tools deliver insights with minimal clicks, require no coding, and offer built-in templates for common accreditation tasks. Simplicity drives adoption.
Online proctoring uses technology to monitor students during exams to ensure academic integrity. It can involve live human proctors, AI-based monitoring, or a combination of both. It's widely used in online and hybrid programs to meet accreditation and academic honesty standards.
Remote proctoring tools typically use webcams, screen recording, and AI to detect suspicious behaviors like eye movement, additional people, or use of unauthorized resources. Some systems also verify identity using government-issued ID and facial recognition.Online proctoring uses technology to monitor students during exams to ensure academic integrity. It can involve live human proctors, AI-based monitoring, or a combination of both. It's widely used in online and hybrid programs to meet accreditation and academic honesty standards.
The main types include:
Each has trade-offs in cost, scalability, and security.
Key considerations include:
Yes, most accreditors allow online proctoring if academic integrity is preserved and the technology is accessible and secure. Our team ensures your implementation aligns with standards like HLC’s Criteria for Teaching and Learning or ACPE’s expectations for exam integrity.
Student reactions vary. Common concerns include privacy, technical issues, and anxiety. Clear communication, practice tests, and transparent data policies can improve acceptance. Institutions should balance integrity with empathy and accessibility.
Students often worry about being recorded, data storage, and potential misuse. To mitigate these concerns, institutions should select vendors with strong privacy policies, minimal data retention, and full compliance with FERPA, GDPR, and other regulations.
Insights from proctoring systems can highlight test-taking behaviors, technical access issues, and course-level integrity trends. This data can inform policy updates, instructional support, and even equity interventions.
InNot all are. Institutions must ensure platforms meet WCAG and ADA standards. Features like screen reader compatibility, extended time settings, and human override options are essential for inclusivity.
We help institutions evaluate, select, and integrate proctoring solutions into their assessment ecosystems. From policy development to tech stack compatibility and faculty training, our approach ensures smooth adoption with minimal disruption.
Offshoring means hiring software developers or entire teams in countries with lower labor costs to build or maintain your EdTech platform. It’s a common strategy for startups and growing SaaS companies that need technical talent without the cost of full-time U.S.-based engineers.
Pros:
Cons:
Success depends on strong project management and documentation—something EdTechXperts helps leadership teams establish.
Key strategies include:
We help teams establish agile cadences and communication protocols that keep offshore work aligned with strategic goals.
Top destinations include:
The right location depends on your budget, tech stack, and collaboration needs.
When managed well, offshore teams can deliver high-quality code. But without clear specs and QA processes, quality suffers. The best outcomes come from blended teams, where offshore engineers are paired with strong product and QA oversight from U.S.-based leads.